11-08-2025

The Brain Can Heal Itself. Impact and Consequences of an Ischemic Stroke

Luis B. Tovar-y-Romo
THE IMPACT OF AN ISCHEMIC STROKE
An ischemic stroke is caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain. When blood can’t reach a part of the brain, the deprived of oxygen brain cells die within minutes. This cell death triggers off a cascade of events: the dying neurons release excess glutamate and other chemicals, causing a chain reaction of damage in the surrounding tissue. The immediate result is a disruption of neural circuits—the interconnected pathways of neurons that typically carry signals for movement, speech, and other functions. In other words, a stroke doesn’t just kill individual brain cells; it breaks the communication lines between them. Depending on where the stroke happens, different abilities can be affected.

For example, a stroke in the motor cortex (the brain’s movement control area) often causes weakness or paralysis in the opposite side of the body, a condition called hemiparesis or hemiplegia. In fact, weakness in one arm and hand is one of the most common and disabling consequences of a stroke. Similarly, suppose the stroke damages the left side of the brain where language is typically located (e.g. Broca’s or Wernicke’s areas). In that case, the person may experience aphasia, which affects speaking, understanding, reading, or writing language. About a third of stroke survivors have some aphasia in the acute phase. These sudden losses occur because the stroke interrupted or destroyed the neural circuits that control those functions.

When a stroke strikes the motor cortex, the neural circuits that direct voluntary movement are sharply affected. Neurons in the primary motor cortex, the strip of brain tissue running ear-to-ear on the top of the head (figure 1) are organized in a “map” of the body that sends precise signals to muscles. An ischemic stroke in this area knocks out part of that map. For instance, if neurons that control the right hand are deprived of blood, the person may lose the ability to move that hand. Even if they aren’t directly killed, surrounding neurons can go temporarily offline because their inputs and outputs have suddenly vanished. This widespread silencing of brain areas connected to the stroke site is called diaschisis. In the case of a left-hemisphere stroke affecting language areas such as the left frontal lobe’s speech area, the immediate effect is that the neural circuit for language production or comprehension is broken. The person might suddenly find that they can’t form words or can’t make sense of others’ speech, because the networks of neurons that typically coordinate those tasks can no longer communicate adequately. Right after a stroke, the brain’s neural circuits in the affected regions are in disarray: some neurons are dead, some are injured, and many are cut off from their usual connections. 



Figure 1. The motor cortex

SELF-REPAIRED BRAINS: NEUROPLASTICITY
Despite the devastation a stroke causes, the brain has a remarkable capacity for self-repair and adaptation—a property known as neuroplasticity. In the days, weeks, and months following an ischemic stroke, a process of spontaneous recovery often occurs. In fact, the first three to six months post-stroke are considered a period of heightened plasticity during which the brain is most actively reorganizing. During this time, many stroke survivors regain a portion of their lost abilities without intensive intervention, thanks to the brain’s intrinsic healing efforts.

What exactly is happening in the brain during this spontaneous recovery? Scientists have identified several mechanisms: some brain regions that went offline due to diaschisis begin to resume activity. As swelling and acute inflammation subside, neurons that survived the stroke injury can start firing again. For example, areas adjacent to the stroke or in the opposite hemisphere that may have been temporarily inhibited, over time, their function can partially return as the overall environment stabilizes. Alternatively, the brain actively “re-wires” itself to compensate for the lost circuits. Neurons are not fixed like wires in a circuit board: they can sprout new connections. After a stroke, surviving neurons near the damaged area (in the ischemic penumbra) start to put out new branches (axons and dendrites) to reconnect with other neurons that lost their original partners. Research has shown that stroke triggers regenerative responses in which neurons form new pathways among the surviving cells. This structural plasticity can sometimes even involve neurons on the opposite side of the brain forming new cross-connections to help out.

Immediately after a stroke, many neural circuits are underactive because inputs were lost, while some may become overactive due to the loss of normal inhibitory signals. The brain engages in homeostatic plasticity (see box), a mechanism that attempts to rebalance overall activity. Neurons increase the sensitivity (strength) of their existing synapses if they aren’t receiving enough input, as a way to “boost” signals in a weakened network. This makes the remaining connections more efficient and partially compensates for lost neurons. In parallel, the brain also employs Hebbian plasticity—the classic “cells that fire together, wire together” principle—meaning that frequently used neural pathways are reinforced over time. For a stroke survivor who is re-learning to move a hand or to say a word, every successful attempt helps strengthen whatever new pathways are being formed to achieve that task.

While neuroplasticity is generally beneficial, it doesn’t always recreate a perfect circuit. Sometimes the brain’s attempt to rewire can lead to maladaptive connections—new pathways that are inefficient or even counterproductive. One example happens in the motor system. The uninjured hemisphere’s motor cortex can indeed help, but if it starts to dominate control of the affected limbs, it might actually interfere with the recovery of the original side. Studies have suggested that movements can become abnormal or uncoordinated when too many signals controlling a paretic (weakened) limb come from the opposite hemisphere. In other words, the “helper” connections from the healthy side might not be well-tuned for smooth movement. Researchers observed that if the contralesional (opposite side) motor cortex projections take over excessively, this correlates with the development of abnormal muscle synergies—involuntary coupling of movements, where trying to move one part causes unintended movements in another.

For a stroke survivor and their loved ones, understanding that the brain is not static offers hope: even after profound injury, the brain’s networks can reconfigure themselves and recover spontaneously to an extent, especially with time, practice, and sometimes a little help from medical interventions. The resilience and plasticity of the human brain are the foundations upon which recovery from stroke is built, turning a sudden loss of function into a gradual restoration journey.

Homeostasis


UNAM Internacional


Do you remember those famous “mobiles” by Alexander Calder? Starting in the 1930s, this artist-engineer from the United States developed moving sculptures (kinetic sculptures) that had the ability to retrieve their original stable position after wind or human action destabilized them.

Based on a delicate balance among its components (a complex system of weights and forces searching for equilibrium), Calder’s mobiles represent, from an aesthetic point of view, a characteristic that Walter Cannon described since the 1920s: homeostasis. The concept was formed from the Greek words ὅμοιος (hómoios: similar) y στάσις (stásis: state and stability) and described the ability of organisms to retrieve their original stable form after alteration or during their interaction with the environment.

This self-stabilizing propriety has been observed in all kinds of organisms and has became a helpful tool for explaining autoregulation processes in cells and biological organisms. An extraordinary example of this is homeostatic plasticity (the dynamics that rebuild functions in the brain after a stroke).

The concept traveled far: it reached technology and cybernetics. A thermostat is an automatic mechanism of temperature regulation, therefore an example of homeostasis. It is also present in the performance of dynamic systems that can change their functioning parameters without human intervention.

The idea has even been transported to social sciences (without true success): since Adam Smith in the 18th century proposed the metaphor about individual interest being regulated by an “invisible hand”, some paradigms (especially those that follow the natural sciences model avoiding social specificities) have tried to explain certain social phenomena from the autoregulation point of view.

But this is a dangerous leap since social systems lack the natural mechanisms that allow homeostasis; they are always responding to interest. We should not trust social, economic, and political conflicts to solve themselves: they need our active participation and compromise with what we deem the ideal of living together.


Luis B. Tovar-y-Romo studied Basic Biomedical Research and obtained a PhD in Biomedical Sciences at UNAM. He has done research in the Institute of Developmental Biology in Marseille-Luminy, France, and in the Department of Neurology of the Johns Hopkins University’s Medicine School. He has also been a special volunteer in the National Institute of Aging of the United States. He has been awarded several prizes for his research. He is a member of the National System of Researchers (level II). He is a senior researcher of the Department of Molecular Neuropathology of UNAM’s Institute of Cellular Physiology, of which he is the director since May 2024.
Current issue
Share:
   
Previous issues
More
Encuadre (12)
Entrevista (2)
Entérate (21)
Experiencias (3)
Enfoque (3)